It has been well over a decade since the human genome was first sequenced and the pace of integration of genomic knowledge into clinical practice has been quite slow. One of the primary areas where there have been a number of advances is pharmacogenomics. An article in the Journal of the American Medical Association describes a pilot effort at Stanford to use whole genome sequencing to guide clinical practice. (JAMA Article) The cost of whole genome sequencing has dropped to around $1000, although a really comprehensive and trustworthy report of an individual’s genome and associated biochemistry would cost several times that. Stanford’s Medical School did a pilot on 12 volunteers to ascertain what would be involved in trying to use whole genome sequencing to help guide medical care of a patient. Each genome was sequenced twice, by different companies. Reports were developed from databases of standard genetic variants and disease associations. The two sequencing efforts had very highly similar results in most cases but there were differences in some specific types of genetic variations, which raises the usual concerns about any diagnostic test–you must have a very high degree of confidence in its accuracy before you can use it for clinical purposes. The total cost for sequencing and writing a report on patient-specific risks was around $14,500 per person; which is not a cost the system is likely to want to bear. Six individuals with different professional backgrounds did the genomic interpretation and there was not always a high level of interpretive agreement. Another interesting finding was that 11 of the 12 tested people had at least one known variant affecting drug metabolism. This area of pharmacogenomics seems particularly important as an aid to prescribing and monitoring of drug therapies and probably will be the first area to become a routine test for all patients. The process of genome sequencing and interpreting is not only costly itself, it would in this pilot have generated significant follow-up costs through additional testing and referrals to physicians to further evaluate disease risks. The promise of genomics to provide truly individualized care is great, but only if the information is trustworthy and the clinical significance is clear.
✅ Subscribe via Email
About this Blog
The Healthy Skeptic is a website about the health care system, and is written by Kevin Roche, who has many years of experience working in the health industry. Mr. Roche is available to assist health care companies through consulting arrangements through Roche Consulting, LLC and may be reached at khroche@healthy-skeptic.com.
Healthy Skeptic Podcast
Research
MedPAC 2019 Report to Congress
June 18, 2019
Headlines
Tags
Access
ACO
Care Management
Chronic Disease
Comparative Effectiveness
Consumer Directed Health
Consumers
Devices
Disease Management
Drugs
EHRs
Elder Care
End-of-Life Care
FDA
Financings
Genomics
Government
Health Care Costs
Health Care Quality
Health Care Reform
Health Insurance
Health Insurance Exchange
HIT
HomeCare
Hospital
Hospital Readmissions
Legislation
M&A
Malpractice
Meaningful Use
Medicaid
Medical Care
Medicare
Medicare Advantage
Mobile
Pay For Performance
Pharmaceutical
Physicians
Providers
Regulation
Repealing Reform
Telehealth
Telemedicine
Wellness and Prevention
Workplace
Related Posts
Commentary
Some Truths About the US Healthcare System
December 14, 2024
Some Truths About the US Healthcare System
The US health system has its problems but is generally better than that in other…
Commentary
Minnesota’s Economy Sucks
December 13, 2024
Minnesota’s Economy Sucks
Minnesota has negative after-inflation personal income growth as the Incompetent Blowhard's policies destroy the state's…
Commentary
On Another Science Front; the Universe Is Ending
December 13, 2024
On Another Science Front; the Universe Is Ending
Its over, Johnny, its over, but there is still time left to have some fun.