It has been well over a decade since the human genome was first sequenced and the pace of integration of genomic knowledge into clinical practice has been quite slow. One of the primary areas where there have been a number of advances is pharmacogenomics. An article in the Journal of the American Medical Association describes a pilot effort at Stanford to use whole genome sequencing to guide clinical practice. (JAMA Article) The cost of whole genome sequencing has dropped to around $1000, although a really comprehensive and trustworthy report of an individual’s genome and associated biochemistry would cost several times that. Stanford’s Medical School did a pilot on 12 volunteers to ascertain what would be involved in trying to use whole genome sequencing to help guide medical care of a patient. Each genome was sequenced twice, by different companies. Reports were developed from databases of standard genetic variants and disease associations. The two sequencing efforts had very highly similar results in most cases but there were differences in some specific types of genetic variations, which raises the usual concerns about any diagnostic test–you must have a very high degree of confidence in its accuracy before you can use it for clinical purposes. The total cost for sequencing and writing a report on patient-specific risks was around $14,500 per person; which is not a cost the system is likely to want to bear. Six individuals with different professional backgrounds did the genomic interpretation and there was not always a high level of interpretive agreement. Another interesting finding was that 11 of the 12 tested people had at least one known variant affecting drug metabolism. This area of pharmacogenomics seems particularly important as an aid to prescribing and monitoring of drug therapies and probably will be the first area to become a routine test for all patients. The process of genome sequencing and interpreting is not only costly itself, it would in this pilot have generated significant follow-up costs through additional testing and referrals to physicians to further evaluate disease risks. The promise of genomics to provide truly individualized care is great, but only if the information is trustworthy and the clinical significance is clear.
By Kevin RocheMarch 13, 2014Commentary
✅ Subscribe via Email
About this Blog
The Healthy Skeptic is a website about the health care system, and is written by Kevin Roche, who has many years of experience working in the health industry. Mr. Roche is available to assist health care companies through consulting arrangements through Roche Consulting, LLC and may be reached at [email protected].
Healthy Skeptic Podcast
This is an outstanding report on total global drug spending and trends, with projections out to 2025. It helps you understand this important area of health care, which does much...
June 1, 2021
MedPAC 2019 Report to Congress
June 18, 2019
Another example of over-priced companies trying to find some way to survive in the post-epidemic financial world. Transcarent, which does something, somehow to “access high quality, affordable care” is buying...
March 6, 2023
In an attempt to swiftly revive two floundering health care companies, a PE firm has announced the merger and recapitalization of Revive Health and SwiftMD. You know they are...
January 30, 2023
Investors have not yet learned their lesson, as Pearl Health gathers a new round of $75 million in capital for its business of supporting physicians who want to participate in...
January 30, 2023
Access ACO Care Management Chronic Disease Comparative Effectiveness Consumer Directed Health Consumers Devices Disease Management Drugs EHRs Elder Care End-of-Life Care FDA Financings Genomics Government Health Care Costs Health Care Quality Health Care Reform Health Insurance Health Insurance Exchange HIT HomeCare Hospital Hospital Readmissions Legislation M&A Malpractice Meaningful Use Medicaid Medical Care Medicare Medicare Advantage Mobile Pay For Performance Pharmaceutical Physicians Providers Regulation Repealing Reform Telehealth Telemedicine Wellness and Prevention Workplace
March 21, 2023
Minnesota’s New Energy Insanity, Part 7
Minnesota is a particularly poor place to rely on solar power, but other states aren't…
March 21, 2023
A Quick SVB Follow-up
As I suspected, the SVB saga is primarily one of regulatory malfeasance, coupled with political…
March 19, 2023
Tom Frieden Speaks in the WSJ
A public health expert writes an article for the WSJ which amply demonstrates why Americans…