The Medicare risk contracting business has always been dogged by accusations that it cherry-picks enrollees. In its earliest form, the claim was that the plans sought the healthiest beneficiaries as enrollees. Now that CMS has begun risk adjusting payments for the latest iteration of Medicare risk contracting, Medicare Advantage, the plans are charged with seeking less healthy enrollees, for whom they get higher payments and with doing extensive assessments to multiply the diagnoses which lead to the increased reimbursement. An article in the Journal of Health Economics examines the reality of these practices. (JHE Article) The authors used medical claims from two Medicare Advantage plans, one with a contracted provider design and one in an integrated delivery system/health plan model. The authors found that over 48 combinations of medical conditions, the two types of plans have highly correlated margins, suggesting that the model of plan makes little difference. For both plans, margins varied very widely across the 48 combinations. And they find that for conditions which generally are treated by primary care physicians and are amenable to care management, the average cost of treatment is lower for Medicare Advantage than in fee-for-service Medicare, but the same is not true for conditions which are more commonly treated by specialists or are acute conditions for which care management often offers little benefit. The authors find no evidence to support the hypothesis that Medicare Advantage plans recruit patients with the higher-margin combinations of conditions.
Medicare Advantage Plans and Enrollee Selection
No Comments
✅ Subscribe via Email
About this Blog
The Healthy Skeptic is a website about the health care system, and is written by Kevin Roche, who has many years of experience working in the health industry. Mr. Roche is available to assist health care companies through consulting arrangements through Roche Consulting, LLC and may be reached at khroche@healthy-skeptic.com.
Healthy Skeptic Podcast
Research
MedPAC 2019 Report to Congress
June 18, 2019
Headlines
Tags
Access
ACO
Care Management
Chronic Disease
Comparative Effectiveness
Consumer Directed Health
Consumers
Devices
Disease Management
Drugs
EHRs
Elder Care
End-of-Life Care
FDA
Financings
Genomics
Government
Health Care Costs
Health Care Quality
Health Care Reform
Health Insurance
Health Insurance Exchange
HIT
HomeCare
Hospital
Hospital Readmissions
Legislation
M&A
Malpractice
Meaningful Use
Medicaid
Medical Care
Medicare
Medicare Advantage
Mobile
Pay For Performance
Pharmaceutical
Physicians
Providers
Regulation
Repealing Reform
Telehealth
Telemedicine
Wellness and Prevention
Workplace
Related Posts
Commentary
A New Way to Do a Fake Jobs Report
October 4, 2024
A New Way to Do a Fake Jobs Report
The Bureau of Lying Statistics miraculously finds a record new 800,000 government jobs to make…
Commentary
More on Deaths and Causes
October 4, 2024
More on Deaths and Causes
An ongoing study examines the global burden of disease, including causes of death.
Commentary
Real Temperature Trends
October 3, 2024
Real Temperature Trends
New methods again demonstrate that we are currently in a cool period and there is…