The Dartmouth Atlas Reports on geographic variation in the cost and quality of health care have sparked a long-running controversy over the actual existence of such variation for various types of insurance and if it does exist, what the causes might be. The latest report in the series looks at variation in pediatric care. (Dartmouth Report) The report’s value is limited by analyzing only data from Vermont, New Hampshire and Maine, which are hardly representative of the entire United States and represent only a small fraction of the health care delivered in the country. But it does give some indication of what might be expected to be found if a similar analysis were done for the entire country. The authors analyze variation from their now familiar categories of effective care, preference-sensitive care and supply-sensitive care. They find that all three factors appear to be involved in geographic variation in pediatric care. Using data from 2007 to 2010 in the Medicaid and all-payer claims databases from the three states, they found a wide variation in annual office visit rates, from 1.5 in some areas to 3.5 in others. At least part of this variation appears to be due to the number and location of physician offices in relation to the child. A similar variation is found in emergency room visits, with a similar higher rate of use when ERs are nearer to the patient. Socioeconomic factors and source of insurance do not appear to explain much of the variation. There does appear to be a strong substitution effect between office visit rates and ER use, with higher ER use where there are lower rates of office visits, suggesting that ERs are substituting for effective primary care. There was significant variation in performance on common pediatric care quality measures, in some cases as much as twofold, but overall, performance was fairly good. Rates of hospital use also varied extensively, which is somewhat surprising because there are few indications for pediatric hospitalization and the guidelines are fairly well agreed to and disseminated. The use of ear tubes to control ear infections varied by four times across the area, but this is an area where this is not clear consensus about appropriate use. Tonsillectomies showed a two-fold variation, and here there likely is a high rate of inappropriate use, since research no suggests little benefit in most cases. Diagnostic imaging again displayed large variation, and concerns about children’s exposure to radiation should counsel for conservatism in this area. Finally, drug use was highly variable, particularly for psychiatric medications, which are widely perceived to be overused in children. The overall picture is one of high variation, with at least a suggestion that in some high-utilizing areas there may be a fair amount of inappropriate care delivery for children.
✅ Subscribe via Email
About this Blog
Healthy Skeptic Podcast
Research
MedPAC 2019 Report to Congress
June 18, 2019
Headlines
Tags
Access
ACO
Care Management
Chronic Disease
Comparative Effectiveness
Consumer Directed Health
Consumers
Devices
Disease Management
Drugs
EHRs
Elder Care
End-of-Life Care
FDA
Financings
Genomics
Government
Health Care Costs
Health Care Quality
Health Care Reform
Health Insurance
Health Insurance Exchange
HIT
HomeCare
Hospital
Hospital Readmissions
Legislation
M&A
Malpractice
Meaningful Use
Medicaid
Medical Care
Medicare
Medicare Advantage
Mobile
Pay For Performance
Pharmaceutical
Physicians
Providers
Regulation
Repealing Reform
Telehealth
Telemedicine
Wellness and Prevention
Workplace
Related Posts
Commentary
May 30, 2023
The CV-19 and Vax Lies Continue
Three pieces of misleading research or at least reporting of research indicate why science is…
Commentary
May 29, 2023
Expect More of This
Minnesota's suicide rate has risen by 40% in twenty years. Democrats have been in charge…
Commentary
May 29, 2023
Some Quick Climate News
CO2 and temperature have a complex relationship and the Arctic isn't going through unprecendented warmth.