Now this is a truly significant health care problem. A small number of patients account for a very large percent of overall health spending. Many are incapacitated physically or mentally and incapable of making decisions about their health care. Many of these patients have a surrogate–someone who can make those decisions for them and who is hopefully following the patient’s wishes. But many do not have a surrogate, leaving a real quandary for health care providers. A Perspective in the New England Journal of Medicine addresses the problem. (NEJM Perspective) Some of these patients might have an advance directive about care, but most do not and many are homeless, mentally ill, and socially abandoned. Most states have some regulatory framework for physician decision-making, particularly in emergency situations, where care can usually be given without patient consent when there is lack of capacity and no surrogate. And some states designate an automatic surrogate when the patient has not named one. But there are likely tens of thousands of patients who are “unrepresented” and who often incur extremely large health care bills. Some states have tried to create a judicial mechanism to appoint a guardian, but legal processes are slow and for patients with no assets and no family it is hard to find someone to act as a guardian. So in many cases doctors must simply do what they think best or what they guess the patient might have wanted. But doctors can have conflicts regarding how much care a patient receives and may also be inclined to do as much as possible so they won’t be criticized. The authors suggest using an ethics committee to make decisions for these patients. That also seems very cumbersome. What would be a better solution is to direct doctors to care for patients without surrogates in the most conservative manner and specifically not to take heroic measures which are unlikely to benefit the patient. Since most of these patients are being paid for by the taxpayers and research clearly shows that patients are better off, even from a survival perspective, with more conservative care in most cases, that is the most reasonable course of action.
Medical Decision-Making for Patients Without Surrogates
No Comments
✅ Subscribe via Email
About this Blog
The Healthy Skeptic is a website about the health care system, and is written by Kevin Roche, who has many years of experience working in the health industry. Mr. Roche is available to assist health care companies through consulting arrangements through Roche Consulting, LLC and may be reached at [email protected].
Healthy Skeptic Podcast
Research
MedPAC 2019 Report to Congress
June 18, 2019
Headlines
Tags
Access
ACO
Care Management
Chronic Disease
Comparative Effectiveness
Consumer Directed Health
Consumers
Devices
Disease Management
Drugs
EHRs
Elder Care
End-of-Life Care
FDA
Financings
Genomics
Government
Health Care Costs
Health Care Quality
Health Care Reform
Health Insurance
Health Insurance Exchange
HIT
HomeCare
Hospital
Hospital Readmissions
Legislation
M&A
Malpractice
Meaningful Use
Medicaid
Medical Care
Medicare
Medicare Advantage
Mobile
Pay For Performance
Pharmaceutical
Physicians
Providers
Regulation
Repealing Reform
Telehealth
Telemedicine
Wellness and Prevention
Workplace
Related Posts
Commentary
March 28, 2024
More Economic News
The Congressional Budget Office is expressing increasing alarm at the federal deficit and debt situation.
Commentary
March 27, 2024
Funniest Story of the Day
Would would have thought that hail could destroy a solar farm? Certainly not the nut-case…
Commentary
March 27, 2024
What Is Going on in the US Debt Markets?
The Treasury seems determined to rely on massive amounts of short-term debt to finance our…