Now this is a truly significant health care problem. A small number of patients account for a very large percent of overall health spending. Many are incapacitated physically or mentally and incapable of making decisions about their health care. Many of these patients have a surrogate–someone who can make those decisions for them and who is hopefully following the patient’s wishes. But many do not have a surrogate, leaving a real quandary for health care providers. A Perspective in the New England Journal of Medicine addresses the problem. (NEJM Perspective) Some of these patients might have an advance directive about care, but most do not and many are homeless, mentally ill, and socially abandoned. Most states have some regulatory framework for physician decision-making, particularly in emergency situations, where care can usually be given without patient consent when there is lack of capacity and no surrogate. And some states designate an automatic surrogate when the patient has not named one. But there are likely tens of thousands of patients who are “unrepresented” and who often incur extremely large health care bills. Some states have tried to create a judicial mechanism to appoint a guardian, but legal processes are slow and for patients with no assets and no family it is hard to find someone to act as a guardian. So in many cases doctors must simply do what they think best or what they guess the patient might have wanted. But doctors can have conflicts regarding how much care a patient receives and may also be inclined to do as much as possible so they won’t be criticized. The authors suggest using an ethics committee to make decisions for these patients. That also seems very cumbersome. What would be a better solution is to direct doctors to care for patients without surrogates in the most conservative manner and specifically not to take heroic measures which are unlikely to benefit the patient. Since most of these patients are being paid for by the taxpayers and research clearly shows that patients are better off, even from a survival perspective, with more conservative care in most cases, that is the most reasonable course of action.
✅ Subscribe via Email
About this Blog
The Healthy Skeptic is a website about the health care system, and is written by Kevin Roche, who has many years of experience working in the health industry. Mr. Roche is available to assist health care companies through consulting arrangements through Roche Consulting, LLC and may be reached at [email protected].
Healthy Skeptic Podcast
This is an outstanding report on total global drug spending and trends, with projections out to 2025. It helps you understand this important area of health care, which does much...
June 1, 2021
MedPAC 2019 Report to Congress
June 18, 2019
What do you get when you combine a company with a commodity business model, that out of desperation massively overpays for another company that has a commodity business model? $10...
July 27, 2022
The “stupid” model for health care venture capital investing is alive and well. Everside health, which operates primary care clinics and has grown by acquiring other failing health care businesses,...
July 26, 2022
Apparently not even a cute name can save you if you have a stupid business. I constantly bemoan the mis-application of capital and health care is Exhibit A. Olive, another...
July 26, 2022
Access ACO Care Management Chronic Disease Comparative Effectiveness Consumer Directed Health Consumers Devices Disease Management Drugs EHRs Elder Care End-of-Life Care FDA Financings Genomics Government Health Care Costs Health Care Quality Health Care Reform Health Insurance Health Insurance Exchange HIT HomeCare Hospital Hospital Readmissions Legislation M&A Malpractice Meaningful Use Medicaid Medical Care Medicare Medicare Advantage Mobile Pay For Performance Pharmaceutical Physicians Providers Regulation Repealing Reform Telehealth Telemedicine Wellness and Prevention Workplace