The individual mandate, employer mandate and the Medicaid expansion are the cornerstones of the supposed expansion of health care coverage that will occur as a result of the reform law. Health insurance exchanges are critical to the performance of the individual mandate and are also used for Medicaid sign-ups. Therefore, it is worth understanding how traditional health insurance markets have worked in terms of eligibility and pricing and how the new insurance exchanges may be affected by changes in those eligibility and pricing rules. Recent research from the National Bureau of Economic Research attempts to do just that. (NBER Paper) The authors created a model of what would happen in the exchanges based on the pricing and eligibility conditions set by the ACA and on behavior exhibited by actual members in a large employer health plan. They simulated several other pricing and eligibility rules and other aspects that could affect what happens in the exchanges. The most notable conclusion is that the ACA pricing and eligibility rules will lead to extreme adverse selection, which essentially makes anything other than the Bronze plans, which have very poor coverage, unaffordable. Allowing varying levels of health status pricing reduces adverse selection and improves the overall level of coverage available, although it may cause overall welfare loss. The model indicates that absent subsidies or penalties, 26% of the population would opt out if health status pricing is not permitted, and those would be almost all the younger and healthier people, which means that policies will cost more for those who are in the exchange, creating a cycle with more dropouts, higher premiums, etc. Very high subsidies (or penalties), on the order of $3000 a year, are required to keep this from happening in the model. Experience thus far in the exchanges, although very limited, indicates that in fact only high risk individuals are signing up and most of those are going into Medicaid, which directly imposes a cost on the public, or are receiving large subsidies. Unless this changes, the public is going to face a much larger tax bill for Medicaid and subsidies than the advocates of reform projected, and many fewer people are going to end up with insurance than was projected and the cost for those individuals will be higher that was estimated. As the model used in this research paper suggests, all of this should have been anticipated and it should have been recognized that the law was not going to have the effects it was promoted to have.
✅ Subscribe via Email
About this Blog
The Healthy Skeptic is a website about the health care system, and is written by Kevin Roche, who has many years of experience working in the health industry. Mr. Roche is available to assist health care companies through consulting arrangements through Roche Consulting, LLC and may be reached at [email protected].
Healthy Skeptic Podcast
This is an outstanding report on total global drug spending and trends, with projections out to 2025. It helps you understand this important area of health care, which does much...
June 1, 2021
MedPAC 2019 Report to Congress
June 18, 2019
It may be investors that need the redesign. They just keep pouring money into this digital health crap despite all the losses. Redesign Health claims that it makes money by...
September 16, 2022
In truth, this seems like more money down a rathole. Google’s parent and other investors are putting a billion dollars into Google’s health arm, Verily. Apparently want to compete with...
September 12, 2022
It is like investors have learned nothing from the past two years. Even supposedly smart investors like Morgan Health, which is making a $20 million contribution to LetsGetChecked, which supposedly...
September 12, 2022
Access ACO Care Management Chronic Disease Comparative Effectiveness Consumer Directed Health Consumers Devices Disease Management Drugs EHRs Elder Care End-of-Life Care FDA Financings Genomics Government Health Care Costs Health Care Quality Health Care Reform Health Insurance Health Insurance Exchange HIT HomeCare Hospital Hospital Readmissions Legislation M&A Malpractice Meaningful Use Medicaid Medical Care Medicare Medicare Advantage Mobile Pay For Performance Pharmaceutical Physicians Providers Regulation Repealing Reform Telehealth Telemedicine Wellness and Prevention Workplace