Research looking at the effects of pay-for-performance initiatives often look at large physician practices. A study in the Journal of the American Medical Association instead focuses on small physician practices to determine how quality does or does not improve under pay-for-performance. These small practices are where a majority of Americans still receive care and historically have had worse quality performance. (JAMA Article) The study was conducted among 1-10 physician practices in New York City, largely in poorer neighborhoods, and with offices that implemented EHRs. Some of these small practices received an incentive and some didn’t, on a random assignment basis. The incentive was paid on each patient for whom quality measures improved and was higher for patients whose care likely would be more intensive. The total possible incentive was about 5% of salary. The measures were primarily related to cardiovascular risk–lowering blood pressure and cholesterol, taking daily aspirin and stopping smoking. A total of 84 clinics participated in the study and they had low to moderate performance on the quality measures at baseline, with the exception of lipid levels, which were well controlled. Both the study and control group showed improvement in quality measures during the research period, but the intervention group showed a greater increase in performance on most measures, including use of aspirin and blood pressure control. The authors conclude that the incentive did lead to faster improvement and also attribute it to having an EHR which provided clinical decision support and prompting. Since all groups had the EHR, however, it is not clear that this on its own was a factor. And another shortcoming here is any showing of improvement in end health or economic outcomes.
Pay-for-Performance, EHRs and Small Practices
No Comments
✅ Subscribe via Email
About this Blog
Healthy Skeptic Podcast
Research
MedPAC 2019 Report to Congress
June 18, 2019
Headlines
Tags
Access
ACO
Care Management
Chronic Disease
Comparative Effectiveness
Consumer Directed Health
Consumers
Devices
Disease Management
Drugs
EHRs
Elder Care
End-of-Life Care
FDA
Financings
Genomics
Government
Health Care Costs
Health Care Quality
Health Care Reform
Health Insurance
Health Insurance Exchange
HIT
HomeCare
Hospital
Hospital Readmissions
Legislation
M&A
Malpractice
Meaningful Use
Medicaid
Medical Care
Medicare
Medicare Advantage
Mobile
Pay For Performance
Pharmaceutical
Physicians
Providers
Regulation
Repealing Reform
Telehealth
Telemedicine
Wellness and Prevention
Workplace
Related Posts
Commentary
June 8, 2023
Yet Another Comprehensive Look at Lockdowns
Another major report finds that lockdowns had very little efficacy, in regard to infections or…
Commentary
June 7, 2023
More and More on Jobs Reports
More BLS machinations around jobs numbers, this time in regard to seasonal adjustments.
Commentary
June 7, 2023
Me on a Podcast
Your opportunity to see and hear me, courtesy of the Michele Tafoya podcast.