The “reform” law made a number of dramatic changes to the private health insurance market, changing many standard practices and creating vast new markets through the public exchanges. Concerns have been raised on the effect of these changes on the prices paid by individuals who are now mandated to have coverage and on employer costs for health benefits. A report from the Rand organization looks at what the likely effect of all the changes will be on enrollment and premiums. (Rand Report) The authors used Rand’s long-standing insurance market model to try to understand these effects in ten geographically and demographically variable states. The model suggests that about 8.2% of people will still be uninsured in 2016, assuming full Medicaid expansion, versus 19.6% if the law were not in effect. In Minnesota the rate is projected to be only 5% and in Texas, 12%. Without that Medicaid expansion, the rate of the uninsured would be several points higher. The model also suggests that individual insurance enrollment will rise dramatically. The effect on rates is projected to be more uneven, with no change in five of the ten states, increases up to 43% in three and decreases in two. Similarly, small group enrollment is projected to rise while rates are relatively unaffected. If the filings to date in various states are examined, however, the number and size of premium increases appears to much greater than Rand’s model suggests. Rand and others tend to minimize the effect of premium changes by noting that many individuals will get subsidies. This is very misleading; those subsidies are paid for by the public in the form of direct taxes, or indirect ones in the form of higher costs for all goods and services, or foregone wages. The truth, which most proponents of the law do their best to try to ignore, is that the reform law is dramatically raising the cost of both health care and health care coverage for almost every citizen in the country.
ACA Effect on Insurance Premiums
By Kevin RocheSeptember 6, 2013Commentary
✅ Subscribe via Email
About this Blog
The Healthy Skeptic is a website about the health care system, and is written by Kevin Roche, who has many years of experience working in the health industry. Mr. Roche is available to assist health care companies through consulting arrangements through Roche Consulting, LLC and may be reached at [email protected].
Healthy Skeptic Podcast
This is an outstanding report on total global drug spending and trends, with projections out to 2025. It helps you understand this important area of health care, which does much...
June 1, 2021
MedPAC 2019 Report to Congress
June 18, 2019
Another example of over-priced companies trying to find some way to survive in the post-epidemic financial world. Transcarent, which does something, somehow to “access high quality, affordable care” is buying...
March 6, 2023
In an attempt to swiftly revive two floundering health care companies, a PE firm has announced the merger and recapitalization of Revive Health and SwiftMD. You know they are...
January 30, 2023
Investors have not yet learned their lesson, as Pearl Health gathers a new round of $75 million in capital for its business of supporting physicians who want to participate in...
January 30, 2023
Access ACO Care Management Chronic Disease Comparative Effectiveness Consumer Directed Health Consumers Devices Disease Management Drugs EHRs Elder Care End-of-Life Care FDA Financings Genomics Government Health Care Costs Health Care Quality Health Care Reform Health Insurance Health Insurance Exchange HIT HomeCare Hospital Hospital Readmissions Legislation M&A Malpractice Meaningful Use Medicaid Medical Care Medicare Medicare Advantage Mobile Pay For Performance Pharmaceutical Physicians Providers Regulation Repealing Reform Telehealth Telemedicine Wellness and Prevention Workplace
March 27, 2023
Why You Can’t Trust People Who Make Up Stuff About Vax Safety
A couple of studies offer a far better explanation for heart issues in athletes and…
March 25, 2023
Coronamonomania Lives Forever, Part 201
Tired of March Madness? A boringly refreshing dip into some CV-19 research summaries is recommended.
March 24, 2023
The CDC Is a Font of Methodological and Statistical Error
Several times in the last three years I and others have pointed out serious flaws…