A great deal of the improvement desired in the health system is predicated on getting patients and providers to change behavior. Positive and negative incentives for such change are now widely used by health plans, payers and regulators. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has initiated several programs which reward or punish almost every type of provider for certain occurrences, such as hospital readmissions, or in regard to quality of care or efficiency measures. A report from the Health Care Incentives Improvement Institute discusses the state of incentives. (HCIII Report) The authors begin with the perspective that while incentives can be valuable in getting care improvement, they are not easy to apply to complex tasks and systems and often result in worse performance, because the intended recipient becomes demotivated. They note that financial rewards can be perceived as manipulative and that designing rewards that affect a person’s sense of autonomy and purpose may be more effective. While acknowledging that the current predominant fee-for-service system may be a source of cost and appropriate care problems, they don’t believe that payment reform alone will be sufficient to change provider or patient behavior. They believe the focus should be on activating both patients and providers to want to achieve good health and be involved in appropriate care. Shared decision-making based on full and accurate information is a core to their suggested solution. The report is interesting and makes a certain sense, but has little in the way of specifics or different ideas that can actually be implemented.
✅ Subscribe via Email
About this Blog
The Healthy Skeptic is a website about the health care system, and is written by Kevin Roche, who has many years of experience working in the health industry. Mr. Roche is available to assist health care companies through consulting arrangements through Roche Consulting, LLC and may be reached at khroche@healthy-skeptic.com.
Healthy Skeptic Podcast
Research
MedPAC 2019 Report to Congress
June 18, 2019
Headlines
Tags
Access
ACO
Care Management
Chronic Disease
Comparative Effectiveness
Consumer Directed Health
Consumers
Devices
Disease Management
Drugs
EHRs
Elder Care
End-of-Life Care
FDA
Financings
Genomics
Government
Health Care Costs
Health Care Quality
Health Care Reform
Health Insurance
Health Insurance Exchange
HIT
HomeCare
Hospital
Hospital Readmissions
Legislation
M&A
Malpractice
Meaningful Use
Medicaid
Medical Care
Medicare
Medicare Advantage
Mobile
Pay For Performance
Pharmaceutical
Physicians
Providers
Regulation
Repealing Reform
Telehealth
Telemedicine
Wellness and Prevention
Workplace
Related Posts
Commentary
Climate Hysteria, November 30 Edition
November 30, 2024
Climate Hysteria, November 30 Edition
Hard to know if there is a warming trend if you don't have accurate historic…
Commentary
Not News to Those of Us Living in Minnesota
November 29, 2024
Not News to Those of Us Living in Minnesota
A little-known fact about Minnesota won't actually surprise you.
Commentary
Victor Hugo
November 29, 2024
Victor Hugo
My latest biographical report, on French author Victor Hugo.