Government health information technology efforts have a long history of failing, wasting hundreds of millions of dollars and delivering useless functionality. So there should be no surprise that the Government Accountability Office finds in a new report that the insurance exchanges mandated by the health reform law are behind schedule. (GAO Report) States could either do the exchanges totally themselves, work with HHS to create one, or leave the responsibility totally with the federal government. Unfortunately for HHS, 19 states had the foresight to leave the mess completely to the feds and another 15 states and relying on HHS in part. All the exchanges are expected to be up and running by October 1 of this year, to enable enrollment for the 2014 year. HHS only recently finalized much of the necessary rules and guidance for exchange functioning. A critical piece is a data hub and establishing and operating major databases is a complex task, one that the federal government has a wonderful record on, especially in the health world. This particular data hub needs to draw from several other well-functioning (not) federal databases. It seems very unlikely that adequate testing will be completed prior to October 1. The process of setting up the “navigators” who are supposed to help consumers understand and make choices in this new, simple, health care world (why are they needed if it is so simple?) is at least two months behind schedule. And of course all of this is costing far more money than originally projected, much of which will be paid by individuals in the form of greater assessments and taxes on insurers. Our money is on the federal exchanges not being fully functional on time and on people being extremely frustrated by very slow response times from the federal data hub and other critical aspects of the exchanges. There is a reason why the biggest private insurers are taking a very cautious approach to selling on the exchanges.
✅ Subscribe via Email
About this Blog
Healthy Skeptic Podcast
Research
MedPAC 2019 Report to Congress
June 18, 2019
Headlines
Tags
Access
ACO
Care Management
Chronic Disease
Comparative Effectiveness
Consumer Directed Health
Consumers
Devices
Disease Management
Drugs
EHRs
Elder Care
End-of-Life Care
FDA
Financings
Genomics
Government
Health Care Costs
Health Care Quality
Health Care Reform
Health Insurance
Health Insurance Exchange
HIT
HomeCare
Hospital
Hospital Readmissions
Legislation
M&A
Malpractice
Meaningful Use
Medicaid
Medical Care
Medicare
Medicare Advantage
Mobile
Pay For Performance
Pharmaceutical
Physicians
Providers
Regulation
Repealing Reform
Telehealth
Telemedicine
Wellness and Prevention
Workplace
Related Posts
Commentary
The Anti-Strib, March 23, 2025
March 23, 2025
The Anti-Strib, March 23, 2025
An outrageous op-ed by our former health commissioner.
Commentary
More on Federal Government Departments
March 22, 2025
More on Federal Government Departments
A little more analysis and history on this very timely topic.
Commentary
The Anti-Strib, March 21 & 22
March 22, 2025
The Anti-Strib, March 21 & 22
Just another day of Trump bashing and Dem protecting by the Strib.