Wellness programs are now widespread and encouraged by the reform law. The Rand group was contracted to evaluate the characteristics and prevalence of these programs, the evidence for impact, the role of incentives and what are factors leading to success. (Rand Report) Rand reviewed the literature, did a survey of employers, analyzed a claims database for wellness impact and did five case studies of employer wellness programs. At least half of employers have at least one wellness effort, either health promotion, or primary or secondary disease prevention. The focus is on diet, weight, exercise, smoking, stress management and the usual litany of chronic diseases. A surprisingly small number of employees, about 46%, take advantage of these programs in some way and only about 20% participate in an intervention recommended based on HRA or screening results. That may change as more employers put higher incentives or penalties in place in regard to wellness participation. The literature suggests positive health effects on an employee population and on individual participants from wellness programs, but not as large as would be hoped. While employers strongly believe that their wellness programs reduce medical costs, absenteeism and health-related productivity, many have not actually done an evaluation. Rand’s analysis suggests a lowering of health utilization and costs for employees who do participate, a trend that appears to grow with increasing years in a wellness program. The Rand survey found the use of incentives is widespread and growing, most commonly for HRA completion and participation in a lifestyle intervention. Incentives appear to be effective in changing behavior, at least in the short term. Communication strategies, employee and leadership engagement and continuous evaluation were listed as factors in a successful wellness offering.
✅ Subscribe via Email
About this Blog
Healthy Skeptic Podcast
Research
MedPAC 2019 Report to Congress
June 18, 2019
Headlines
Tags
Access
ACO
Care Management
Chronic Disease
Comparative Effectiveness
Consumer Directed Health
Consumers
Devices
Disease Management
Drugs
EHRs
Elder Care
End-of-Life Care
FDA
Financings
Genomics
Government
Health Care Costs
Health Care Quality
Health Care Reform
Health Insurance
Health Insurance Exchange
HIT
HomeCare
Hospital
Hospital Readmissions
Legislation
M&A
Malpractice
Meaningful Use
Medicaid
Medical Care
Medicare
Medicare Advantage
Mobile
Pay For Performance
Pharmaceutical
Physicians
Providers
Regulation
Repealing Reform
Telehealth
Telemedicine
Wellness and Prevention
Workplace
Related Posts
Commentary
Masking Kids Was Futile and Damaging
February 7, 2025
Masking Kids Was Futile and Damaging
The evidence clearly shows that masking children made no difference in CV-19 infection rates.
Commentary
The First Trump Era Jobs Report
February 7, 2025
The First Trump Era Jobs Report
Incorporating major population and job revisions, the report on January jobs is about as expected.
Commentary
No Need for More CV-19 Vax Doses
February 5, 2025
No Need for More CV-19 Vax Doses
Studies continue to show essentially no benefit from additional doses of CV-19 vax.