Because it sounds so obviously logical, policymakers and payers have been quick to adopt and enforce various pay-for-performance and quality reporting schemes, often ignoring warnings about design and operational issues. A report from the Urban Institute details concerns about such programs and offers suggestions for a path to improving them. (Urban Inst. Report) The goal of quality reporting and incentive programs is quality improvement, yet the evaluations of most of these programs show very little if any progress on that goal to date. This may be because the programs tend to focus on process measures which may have little to do with real health outcomes, but are easier to collect data on. One big problem with these programs is that they are disruptive and expensive to comply with, and they may hinder a clinician’s sense of autonomy and motivation. The authors detail the problems and concerns and then give seven well-thought out recommendations for improving quality reporting, pay-for-performance and value-based purchasing programs: move from measuring process to directly measuring outcomes; don’t rely solely on these programs for quality improvement but use them only where other approaches may not work; measure quality at an organizational level, not that of the individual clinician; measure patient experience and patient-reported outcomes as their own ends; promote rapid-learning through the programs; develop the science of measurement better, especially to avoid unintended consequences; and have only one entity developing measures and standards.
✅ Subscribe via Email
About this Blog
The Healthy Skeptic is a website about the health care system, and is written by Kevin Roche, who has many years of experience working in the health industry. Mr. Roche is available to assist health care companies through consulting arrangements through Roche Consulting, LLC and may be reached at [email protected].
Healthy Skeptic Podcast
This is an outstanding report on total global drug spending and trends, with projections out to 2025. It helps you understand this important area of health care, which does much...
June 1, 2021
MedPAC 2019 Report to Congress
June 18, 2019
Two health care firms owned by private equity firms are merging in a transaction supposedly valued at $3 billion. HealthComp administers self-funded plans for employers and other groups and Virgin...
September 27, 2023
NextGen, an electronic medical records firm, is being put out of its public company misery, as a PE firm will pay $1.6 billion for the one-time high-flier.
September 7, 2023
A number of companies which attracted large financing rounds during the epidemic have imploded when reality set in. The latest is Cano Health, which is a little surprising since it...
August 15, 2023
Access ACO Care Management Chronic Disease Comparative Effectiveness Consumer Directed Health Consumers Devices Disease Management Drugs EHRs Elder Care End-of-Life Care FDA Financings Genomics Government Health Care Costs Health Care Quality Health Care Reform Health Insurance Health Insurance Exchange HIT HomeCare Hospital Hospital Readmissions Legislation M&A Malpractice Meaningful Use Medicaid Medical Care Medicare Medicare Advantage Mobile Pay For Performance Pharmaceutical Physicians Providers Regulation Repealing Reform Telehealth Telemedicine Wellness and Prevention Workplace