There is some research that we know we just shouldn’t bother reading, but we can’t resist, even though we know it will leave us both chortling and annoyed at its vacuous content. A missive from the Brookings Institute called “Bending the Curve: Person-Centered Health Care Reform” fits the bill perfectly. Anytime you can throw at least two buzz phrases in a title, you know you have a winner. (Brookings Report) The authors claim full implementation of their approach will save $1 trillion over 20 years, or is $20 over a trillion years? The usual suspects are rounded up and grilled intensively–change how we pay providers, only pay for quality and outcomes, coordinate care better, get people involved in their care, create benefit designs that encourage use of “valuable” and “appropriate” services. It is not that these and other ideas are not worth trying or don’t have some utility; it is that they trip so lightly off the tongue, with no thought to what is really involved in execution. And they do nothing to address the very fundamental issue–we have disconnected poor health behaviors and use of care from their cost. We are proposing to engineer a massive expansion of Medicaid, which provides gold-plated coverage, often going to individuals who do absolutely nothing to either get and stay healthy or to be good consumers of health care services. And why should they, its all free to them. We get tired of pointing out the obvious. As much as possible, people should pay out of pocket the full cost of their care and/or their care coverage. People who are subsidized by other people should have to use public care resources, such as community health centers, unless they aren’t available and should have to engage in healthy behaviors or they shouldn’t be covered. When responsibility is encouraged, miraculously cost growth will slow down and overall health status will improve.
✅ Subscribe via Email
About this Blog
Healthy Skeptic Podcast
Research
MedPAC 2019 Report to Congress
June 18, 2019
Headlines
Tags
Access
ACO
Care Management
Chronic Disease
Comparative Effectiveness
Consumer Directed Health
Consumers
Devices
Disease Management
Drugs
EHRs
Elder Care
End-of-Life Care
FDA
Financings
Genomics
Government
Health Care Costs
Health Care Quality
Health Care Reform
Health Insurance
Health Insurance Exchange
HIT
HomeCare
Hospital
Hospital Readmissions
Legislation
M&A
Malpractice
Meaningful Use
Medicaid
Medical Care
Medicare
Medicare Advantage
Mobile
Pay For Performance
Pharmaceutical
Physicians
Providers
Regulation
Repealing Reform
Telehealth
Telemedicine
Wellness and Prevention
Workplace
Related Posts
Commentary
March 27, 2023
Why You Can’t Trust People Who Make Up Stuff About Vax Safety
A couple of studies offer a far better explanation for heart issues in athletes and…
Commentary
March 25, 2023
Coronamonomania Lives Forever, Part 201
Tired of March Madness? A boringly refreshing dip into some CV-19 research summaries is recommended.
Commentary
March 24, 2023
The CDC Is a Font of Methodological and Statistical Error
Several times in the last three years I and others have pointed out serious flaws…