One of the current methods for improving quality is to ensure that health care providers don’t gain financially, and may actually suffer, if they make medical errors or otherwise deliver poor quality. Research published in the Journal of the American Medical Association suggests we have a way to go before we get to that point. (JAMA Study) The researchers compared the financial consequences to hospitals from caring for patients with and without surgical complications. Surgery expenses total about $400 billion in the US and complication rates are estimated at from 3% to 17%, depending on procedure and definition of complication. Complications typically add a fairly substantial cost to the surgery. While there has been an increase in payers refusing to pay for certain complications, typically categorized as “never events”, most complication treatment is still reimbursed and may result in higher revenues and profits for hospitals. The authors looked at about 34,000 surgery discharges at a twelve hospital system in the southern US. About 5% of patients experienced a complication. The median length of stay was about 4 times as high for patients with a complication and the costs related to these patients was about $38,000 greater. But the contribution margin was $8000 more for these patients. Private insurance paid significantly more for complication-related stays than did Medicare, but for Medicaid and self-pay patients, the contribution margin was lower. Private insurers in particular end up providing hospitals with significantly greater margins for stays involving complications. Therefore, somewhat contradictorily, cleaning up complication rates would probably cause a deterioration in hospital finances. The authors did not, however, attempt to ascertain the extent to which complications were avoidable or the fault of the hospital. This may turn out to be much like readmissions, where it is unclear that there really is a large number which could be prevented.
Hospital Stay Complications and Financial Consequences
No Comments
✅ Subscribe via Email
About this Blog
Healthy Skeptic Podcast
Research
MedPAC 2019 Report to Congress
June 18, 2019
Headlines
Tags
Access
ACO
Care Management
Chronic Disease
Comparative Effectiveness
Consumer Directed Health
Consumers
Devices
Disease Management
Drugs
EHRs
Elder Care
End-of-Life Care
FDA
Financings
Genomics
Government
Health Care Costs
Health Care Quality
Health Care Reform
Health Insurance
Health Insurance Exchange
HIT
HomeCare
Hospital
Hospital Readmissions
Legislation
M&A
Malpractice
Meaningful Use
Medicaid
Medical Care
Medicare
Medicare Advantage
Mobile
Pay For Performance
Pharmaceutical
Physicians
Providers
Regulation
Repealing Reform
Telehealth
Telemedicine
Wellness and Prevention
Workplace
Related Posts
Commentary
Mixed Economic News
March 18, 2025
Mixed Economic News
Various economic reports and indicators reflect uncertainty.
Commentary
Debunking Climate Hysteria, March 17, 2025
March 17, 2025
Debunking Climate Hysteria, March 17, 2025
Offshore wind farms are a particularly stupid source of unreliable, expensive power.
Commentary
How Altruistic are Doctors?
March 16, 2025
How Altruistic are Doctors?
"Altruistic physicians are less likely than non-altruistic ones to take drug company money or respond…