Talking about you, RFK, Jr., who has made a lot of money pushing lies about vaccines. This study basically covers the entire Danish child population over a large amount of time. It looked at the use of vaccines with aluminum-type adjuvants (an adjuvant helps the vaccine be absorbed and used by the body) and any resulting association with certain adverse events, including autism. Auto-immune and allergic reactions and multiple other health conditions were also examined. Nothing, nada, nil, zip, zero, absolutely nothing. Won’t stop the whackos, never does, they aren’t actually interested in research and data. (Annals Study)
It has not been ignored. It is being criticized.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/study-claiming-no-link-between-aluminum-vaccines-autism-riddled-flaws/
check out who funds that group, which is about as unscientific as possible
I am actually pretty open to this topic after the epic COVID vaccine failure. There are reasonable arguments and critiques of the study in the linked article.
Kevin, I appreciate your experience, expertise, and throughout mind, and I agree with you on many subjects, but radicalism in opinions is not what attracts me to this blog.
Not sure how an opinion that is completely consistent with every single study is “radical”. I get vehement on this topic because it is literally endangering the lives of children for no reason. There are no reasonable arguments that vaccines cause autism–none, because there isn’t one shred of evidence to support that and tons of evidence that it isn’t true.
You need to stop referring to people who choose not to put poison in their children with known toxic metals as, “whackos”. You only read the studies that support your narrative too. It’s all about the dose and compilation of toxins and the ability of the individual body to detox these toxins. Our modern world if filled with toxins from pharmaceuticals, farm and industrial chemicals, cosmetics, and supplements, just to name a few.
Yes, I do believe that vaccines have been the straw that broke the camel’s back for some children and autism. You do have some good articles at times, but I cannot agree with you on vaccines. Especially, since I do not believe that I am able to make you sick. Read the older studies on how science tried to make people sick from other people, did not work. If that is the case, then there is not a need for vaccines because they are built on the Contagion Theory. and I do mean theory.
look if you want to ignore all the real research and believe in the nonsense conspiracy theorists spread, I don’t know what to tell you. I am always going to point out what the truth is.
Are you saying that humans are the only animals that cannot make members of their own species sick? Why would macroscopic parasites cause sickness, but not microscopic parasites? Why would microorganisms decide that the disease niche is a niche too far? Also, do you know what a scientific theory is? As in Universal Theory of Gravitation, Theory of Blood Circulation, Theory of Planetary Motion, Theory of Relativity, Quantum Theory etc.
I’m extremely skepticle of the medical community after cov-fefe. So much crooked stuff went on: doctors who offered alternative treatments to the “vaccine” – with proven results, were cancelled and/or threatened, doctor offices and hospitals insisted on the mask b.s. long after there was data that showed they were, at best, useless. Pharmacies refused to fill patients’ Rx if it was for one of the alternative treatments and the cov-fefe testing was faulty. Those observations along with medical experiences of others, would keep me away from the vaccination bowl of M & M’s, containing one that is poisoned. Vax manufacturers live in a no-fault system, so they can only gain from their mandated shots; vaxxers beware.
The commenters on the article pointed out that there was no comparison with non-vaccinated people. It would be interesting to find out what the statistics are in the Amish community over several decades.
As always, I appreciate the findings you share with us, Kevin, to help us understand the medical world.
I understand the skepticism, it is unfortunately in many cases well justified. There was no unvaxed group because there really aren’t unvaxed children in Denmark. the methodology used is very sound and the results consistent with the results of every well-done study in the US or elsewhere. what scares me is the notion of unvaxed children dying of these easily controlled diseases and passing on the disease to others. We are now seeing that with measles.
My apologies if my understanding is incorrect – though my observation is that austism is highly correlated with the age of the parent. The older the parent at child birth, the higher probability of austism. I dont know whether it is the dad or the mom or both, just noticing that there is high correlation.
The second problem is determining whether there has been an increase over the years. Circa 1900, the autism rate was 1/2000 (maybe? ). Now its around 1/120 (?). Is this an actual increase? Hard to tell since very little data is available based on autism rates by age of parent either today or decades ago. fwiw, one of the major problems in any scientific study is to ability to compare apples to apples and to isolate differences.
Just my observation
Followup question
Kevin
Are you aware of any studies that have attempted to stratify autism rates by age of parent at birth? Curious if my speculation is valid.
With respect to “known toxic metals”, the dose makes the poison. The question is whether it’s toxic at the dose(s) given. Also, what is the proposed MOA for how vaccines could cause autism? I haven’t seen a plausible one yet. Integration with existing knowledge is as important to science as raw data.
What is a possible concern are additive effects between multiple chemicals, each perfectly safe by themselves. But this is a Gordian Knot which will be very hard to unravel.